Kansoku
English日本語简体中文

Choosing a price research tool

By hand, a general scraper, a research firm, or a dedicated monitoring service — what actually separates the four options for tracking competitor prices.

Short answer. If you are watching 30 items or fewer, once a month, do it by hand. If you need it daily, need to show where each figure came from, or need to compare across currencies, a dedicated tool costs less overall.

Below are the differences that actually decide it.

Four options

1. By hand, into a spreadsheet

No setup cost. Up to 30 items, monthly, this is the fastest route.

What breaks is not the count but the frequency. Thirty items daily is nine hundred copies a month, and past that point your main sources of error are missed rows and mistyped figures.

2. A general-purpose scraper

Fetching is cheap. The distance is between fetching and having a figure you can trust.

All three look like success at runtime, and the totals look plausible.

3. A research firm

People look at the pages, so judgement-heavy questions are handled well. Good for a one-off decision.

Poor for continuous work: you cannot buy that accuracy every day, and each refresh is a new invoice.

4. A dedicated price monitoring service (this is where Kansoku sits)

Suited to daily, continuous work where provenance has to be recorded. Overkill for a one-off study.

How to choose

  1. How often? Monthly is option 1. Daily is option 4
  2. How many? Thirty is fine by hand. Hundreds means 2 or 4
  3. Will a person see the figures? Then you need provenance — option 4
  4. Do you need judgement? "Is this price sensible?" is option 3

When Kansoku is the wrong choice

Plainly. If any of these apply, choose something else.

What Kansoku does do

See Solutions and How it works.

Last updated